ANGGA ALVIAN , 2201412120 (2019) THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SPRITZING AND SKIMMING AS TECHNIQUES TO TEACH SPEED READING OF ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION TEXT The Case Study at the Eleventh Graders of SMA N 1 Tawangsari in Academic Year of 2018/2019. Under Graduates thesis, UNNES.

Preview

PDF (THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SPRITZING AND SKIMMING AS TECHNIQUES TO TEACH SPEED READING OF ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION TEXT The Case Study at the Eleventh Graders of SMA N 1 Tawangsari in Academic Year of 2018/2019) - Published Version Download (617kB) | Preview

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to find out whether there is any significant difference in students’ reading speed between those who were taught using spritzing technique and those who were taught using skimming technique, and which one between spritzing technique and skimming technique is more effective to teach reading speed on the eleventh grader of SMA N 1 Tawangsari. To achieve those objectives, the researcher conducted experimental research used quasi-experimental research on non-equivalent control group design. The population of this study was the eleventh graders of SMA N 1 Tawangsari in the academic year 2018/2019. I used simple random sampling to determine the sample. The samples consisted of 36 students. The data were obtained by giving a reading comprehension test to XI Language class which then that class equally divided into two groups: experimental group and control group. The study was started by giving pre-test, treatments, and post-test to both groups. Spritzing technique was used as a treatment in the experimental group, while the control group used the skimming technique by the English teacher. Based on the result, the average time needed for a pre-test for the experimental group was 1102 seconds, and the control group was 1056 seconds. The average score of the post-test for the experimental group was 1204 seconds, and the control group was 1532 seconds. In analyzing the data, a normality test, homogeneity test, and t-test were used. Based on the calculation independent sample t-test of post-test, it showed that sig(2-tailed): 0.858 and rtable for α = 5% was 0.05. It meant that rtable was lower than sig(2-tailed) (0.05 < 0.858). Therefore, Ho was accepted and Ha was refused. It showed that there is no significant difference in students’ reading speed of analytical exposition text between the students who were taught by using the spritzing technique and those who were taught by using the skimming technique.

Actions (login required)

View Item